The case of Rama Teltumbde and Susan Abraham Gonsalves is that immediately after Mr. Teltumbde wrote an posting for Caravan in March this year, the Prison Superintendent has “dictatorially” imposed a ban on Mr. Teltumbde and his co-accused, withholding their letters/communications dealt with to their spouse and children members and advocates. The petition filed via R Satynarayanan calls the action of the SP of withholding or belatedly submitting the letters as “deliberate, destructive, harsh and perverse.”
The petitioner has made representations to the SP and the Exclusive Inspector Normal of Law enforcement requesting to carry the embargo and permit the letters to be sent timely. Nevertheless, no response has been gained in this regard. The petition alleges that the non-responsiveness of the shows callousness on their part.
The petition refers to Rule 17 & 20 of the Maharashtra Prisons (Services to Prisoners) Procedures, 1962, which lays down the subjects on which prisoners may perhaps correspond. It includes individual and personal issues and excludes any make a difference very likely to come to be the subject matter of political propaganda or any criticisms on the administration of the prison or any reference to other people confined in prison. The petitioners argue that the SP misinterpreted the report penned by Mr. Teltumbde as in no way did it even further any political propaganda or speak in opposition to the prison administration. As a result, the embargo on the accused’s communication in response to the post is “illegal, severe and in gross abuse and misuse of powers,” the petition puts forth.
The petition has sought instructions from the Superintendent of Taloja Central Jail to allow the accused and his co-accused in the Elgar Parishad circumstance to generate and obtain letters from their advocates and spouse and children customers. It has also sought to quash the decision of the SP imposing constraints on the rights of correspondence of the accused.
Anand Tletumbde and Vernon Gonsalves have been charged under the Illegal Actions (Avoidance) Act, in the Bhima Koregoan scenario.
Title: Rama Teltumbde & Ors v. Point out of Maharashtra & Ors
Simply click listed here to obtain the buy